lely on the basis of the imagery. There was no singular reason not to include the 1989 Upper Deck card, or any other particular card.Translation: The cards were chosen based on how they looked, not based

SPA-FRANCORCHAMPS, Belgium -- Sebastian Vettel feels Max Verstappen was very bold to attempt the move which led to a three-car collision at Turn 1 of the Belgian Grand Prix.Vettel was spun around at Turn 1 while on the outside of Kimi Raikkonen and Verstappen, who had dived down the inside of the Ferrari drivers after a slow getaway. The collision took all three men out of contention when they had looked best placed to take the fight to polesitter Nico Rosbeg.Vettel, who was on the outside, said he could not see Raikkonen on the inside as he had got ahead of the other Ferrari before contact happened. Though Verstappen blamed both Ferrari drivers for the clash, Vettel does not think the Red Bull drivers move was ever likely to succeed.I had a very good start, I think the best start from the people who were in front of me, he said. I was P2 leading into... Nico was ahead but I was right behind on the outside leading the way into the first corner. Then I could hardly see Kimi because I was more than half a car length ahead when I turned in and to be honest he was already in the blind spot....To speak of Max, just looking at it now was a very bold move trying to recover those two places in one corner diving down the inside, that obviously was the reason why Kimi couldnt turn in and follow the lead that I was dictating as the leading car of that group.With hindsight its easy, I turn in later or go wider and only those two are making contact and I get away with it. The problem is that you cant fit three cars in that corner and the inside one of these able to trigger trouble on the outside which Kimi and myself suffered from.Verstappens aggressive defensive driving on Raikkonen at Les Combes later in the race led to an expletive-laden radio message from the Finn, before forcing Vettel wide at the same corner later in the race. The Dutch teenager then repeated the same move on Vettel, forcing the German wide and across the slip road.?Vettel made it clear he has nothing wrong with Verstappen on a personal level, and respects his aggressive style, but feels Spa was a step too far. The four-time world champion pointed to his own incident with Verstappen, which saw the Dutch defending staunchly despite being about to pit.I think its right to criticise, I think its wrong to make too much of a story, Vettel said. I get along with him, I like him, hes aggressive and I think thats a strength for him, but certain movements especially under braking which I faced when I was racing with him I dont think are correct.Its probably something that needs to click and he needs to understand but in that race there was a lot going on, in the end it wasnt the smartest thing to do because I lost a lot of time, he lost a lot of time and he was about to pit. So arguably for his race whatever it was he lost three or four seconds just fighting with me which was unnecessary. I was clearly faster and got passed him anyway the lap after.Asked if he will raise the issue at the drivers briefing in Monza next weekend, Vettel replied: I will try and talk to Max, not now because I think he didnt have a good day, I didnt have a good day, Kimi didnt have a good day.But Im not a fan of penalising people, its not the way to educate, we need to talk to each other, we need to have respect. I think there has been a couple of manoeuvres that the rest of the field is not happy with his behaviour, as I said the best way to educate and the best way is just to talk rather than create a fuss in the media and try to talk via some other channels. We are men and its best to stand in front of each other and talk to each other.Steve Smith Sr. Jersey . The head of USA Boxing came out swinging Tuesday with an open letter to Tyson -- a former Olympic hopeful himself -- that accuses the former heavyweight champion of trying to poach fighters who might be candidates for the U. Custom Ravens Jerseys . Just as Montreal was settling into the first full working week of a new year, the Impact announced the appointment of their new head coach. http://www.customravensjersey.com/custom-michael-mccrary-jersey-large-863d.html . -- Jakob Silfverberg is making himself right at home with the Anaheim Ducks, scoring four goals in his first four games. Wholesale Custom Ravens Shirts . -- Devin Hester is done returning kicks in Chicago. Marcus Peters Jersey . This should be celebrated because it will not always be this way. With the amount of money given to players by their clubs these days, it is a wonder that so many of those teams allow the sport to continue to take away many of their assets so they can play for a different team in the middle of their season.Three baseball cards stand apart as the unquestioned most iconic pieces of cardboard ever printed: the 1909 T206 Honus Wagner, the first card whose print run was cut short and whose value soared into the millions; the 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle rookie, the true beginning of baseball cards as a piece of Americana; and the 1989 Upper Deck Ken Griffey Jr. rookie, the No. 1 card in the first card set that signaled the beginning of baseball cards as an investment.Given the place that these three cards hold in baseball history, it is baffling that the Baseball Hall of Fames 12-card display on Ken Griffey Jr.s wall, unveiled over the weekend, didnt include the 1989 Upper Deck card.Among the cards included were two unrecognizable cards in the top row, followed by his 1992 Studio card (which collectors never really cared for) and his Topps rookie debut card -- which didnt draw much interest because after Upper Deck, his Donruss and Fleer rookie cards commanded the most attention.The second row features an Upper Deck card from 1990 and another Upper Deck card at the end that is -- wait for it -- a checklist. Huh?The last row is a caricature card from a Score set, and then three more random cards.Thinking that there had to be some strange reason why Griffeys 1989 Upper Deck card wasnt included, I contacted the Hall of Fame to see if they could assist.The design of this exhibit, as with all our exhibits, comes from our curatorial and exhibitions teams, wrote Hall of Fame spokesman Jon Shestakofsky in an e-mmail.dddddddddddd. In this case, the determination of which cards to display was based purely on the visual aesthetic of the wall display as a whole, with cards chosen solely on the basis of the imagery. There was no singular reason not to include the 1989 Upper Deck card, or any other particular card.Translation: The cards were chosen based on how they looked, not based on how important they were in history.Thats fine for other players. Its not fine for Ken Griffey Jr., who -- as any baseball fan between the ages of 35 and 45 knows -- was the object of affection for the golden age of the baseball card.And Ken Griffey Jr.s 1989 Upper Deck card was the real-life version of a golden ticket. We didnt leap for joy in card shops or in our homes when we pulled a 1992 Ken Griffey Jr. Studio card. And I certainly couldnt tell you before I saw this display what Griffeys 1990 Upper Deck card looked like -- unlike its predecessor, whose image is seared into my head for all time.In every museum, I understand there are certain pieces that make it because of how they look. But its time to take Griffeys1989 Upper Deck card and go to a copy shop and blow it up and place it on that wall as soon as possible. Because any fan who has a clue knows that the omission of this card compromises the whole display.To take it a step further, to keep the display as is would be an embarrassment. ' ' '