Für unsere Gäste » recedents fro

LOS ANGELES -- Victoria Vivians scored 19 points and Morgan William had 18 to lead No. 5 Mississippi State to a 76-72 victory over Southern California in the championship game of the Women of Troy Classic on Sunday.Breanna Richardson added 17 points for the Bulldogs, who are 12-0 for the third time in school history. Vivians, William and Richardson combined to shoot 17 for 38.Sadie Edwards scored 24 points and Kristen Simon had 15 for the Trojans (8-2), who snapped a six-game winning streak.After trailing most of the game, the Bulldogs extended their lead to 75-70 on Williams three-point play with 1:26 to play. Courtney Jacos 3-point attempt with 2 seconds remaining hit off the rim and Mississippi State held on to win.Simon scored 11 points in the first half and USC shot 42.3 percent to take a 33-29 lead at the break. Mississippi State outrebounded USC 19-13 in the opening half but shot under 40 percent and committed 13 turnovers.In the tournaments consolation game, SMU defeated Grambling State 56-36 behind Dai Thomas 17 points.BIG PICTUREMississippi State: The Bulldogs completed a nine-game road trip that covered six states and 17,190 miles in 24 days. MSU returns to Starkville and will play five of the next seven games at home.USC: After a strong showing in nonconference play, with one more game to go, USC will begin its Pac-12 schedule Dec. 30 with an improved offensive attack that is averaging 11.1 more points per game than last seasons squad that finished 6-12 in conference.UP NEXTMississippi State: Host Alabama State on Tuesday and then complete its nonconference action against Northwestern State on Dec. 28 before opening its SEC schedule against LSU on New Years Day.USC: At Big West opponent UC Irvine on Wednesday. Replica Soccer Jerseys . All of the scoring came in the final 20:04. Lucic scored on a power play at 15:46 of the third period, when he tipped a shot over Stars goalie Kari Lehtonen for a 3-1 lead. Soccer Jerseys China . Coach Tom Thibodeau says the former MVP will probably start travelling with the team in the next few weeks. Rose tore the meniscus in his right knee at Portland in November and was ruled out for the remainder of the season by the Bulls. https://www.soccerjerseyschina.us/ . Woodson said during a radio interview Thursday that the Knicks Carmelo Anthony doesnt get the same calls as other superstars. Soccer Jerseys Outlet .25 million option on reliever Jose Veras. Wholesale Soccer Jerseys China . The Brazilian goalkeeper signed a loan deal with the Major League Soccer club on Friday as he looks to get playing time ahead of this summers World Cup in his home country. Even as the media storm around his positive dope test plays out, wrestler Narsingh Yadavs fate rests on the National Anti Doping Agency (NADA) hearing?in New Delhi on Wednesday. Here are some questions on the process to be followed:Who will represent him?He is being represented by Krida Legal, a Delhi-based law firm specializing in sports law. Managing partner Vidushpat Singhania, who will lead the defence, has previously served as secretary of the Mudgal panel that was ordered by the Supreme Court to look into the IPL scandal of 2013 and also defended fast bowler Pradeep Sangwan, who was found guilty of using an anabolic steroid during the 2013 IPL season. Singhania has already appeared before the three-member NADA panel at a preliminary hearing on Saturday. Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) president Brij Bhushan Sharan said the verdict should be known by Thursday.What will the defence be?Although Singhania wasnt available for comment, sports law experts believe he faces an uphill task to get Narsinghs suspension overturned. The onus on the defence team will be to prove that the substance found in Narsinghs body was taken inadvertently and that he might have been the victim of a conspiracy -- as Narsingh, his coaches as well as the WFI claims. In all probability, Singhania and his team will base their legal strategy around Article 10.4 and 10.5 of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) code.Whats 10.4?As per Article 10.4, which deals with Elimination of the Period of Ineligibility where there is No Fault or Negligence: If an athlete or other person establishes in an individual case that he or she bears no fault or negligence, then the otherwise applicable period of ineligibility shall be eliminated.And 10.5?Article 10.5 deals with the Reduction of the Period of Ineligibility based on No Significant Fault or Negligence.?It states: Specified substances where the anti-doping rule violation involves a specified subsstance, and the athlete or other person can establish no significant fault or negligence, then the period of ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of ineligibility, and at a maximum, two years of ineligibility, depending on the athletes or other persons degree of fault.dddddddddddd?Is there a precedent?Since both his A and B samples have tested positive, Narsinghs case is not that he hasnt consumed the prohibited substance at all. As the WADA code allows him to escape with a reprimand or no period of ineligibility -- essentially a rap on the knuckles for not being careful enough -- his legal defence will focus on establishing that the banned drug was consumed unknowingly. They will also employ similar precedents from other sports to buttress their argument. Among the more prominent one involved one of the worlds leading badminton players, Ratchanok Intanon, who was recently cleared to compete in Rio after having testing positive for a banned substance in May.According to the Badminton World Federation (BWF), the drug found in Intanons body was administered directly into a muscle tendon for medical reasons, a procedure permitted under the federations rules. The panel concluded that because the route of administration of the substance in the medical treatment process was intratendinous - an authorised administration route - no violation of the regulations was committed, the BWF had said in a statement.And if the judgement goes against him?If the outcome of this process doesnt go in Narsinghs favour, he does have some legal options to appeal. The course of action on that front, if needed, will be decided based on the nature of the verdict. But Narsingh and his camp will be hoping that with the Olympics imminent, he is able to convince the panel of his innocence. ' ' '